127.2 Historic Preservation and Cultural Resources - Revision history

Hoskir: /* 127.2.9.2 Human Remains Encountered During Construction */ updated per RR3924

2024-09-03T19:01:20Z

127.2.9.2 Human Remains Encountered During Construction: updated per RR3924

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 3 September 2024
Line 247:		Line 247:

	===127.2.9.2 Human Remains Encountered During Construction===		===127.2.9.2 Human Remains Encountered During Construction===
	If human remains are encountered during construction, the contractor shall immediately stop all work within a 50-foot radius of the remains and shall not resume without specific authorization from either the SHPO or the local law enforcement officer, whichever party has jurisdiction over and responsibility for such remains. The contractor shall notify the MoDOT Construction Inspector and/or Resident Engineer who will contact the MoDOT HP section within 24 hours of the discovery. MoDOT HP staff will immediately notify the local law enforcement (to ensure that it is not a crime scene) and the SHPO as per RSMo 194 or to notify SHPO what has occurred and that it is covered by Missouri’s Cemeteries Law, §§ 214. RSMo. MoDOT HP staff will notify FHWA that human remains have been encountered within 24 hours of being notified of the find. If, within 24 hours, the contractor is unable to contact appropriate MoDOT staff, the contractor shall initiate the involvement by local law enforcement and the SHPO. A description of the contractor’s actions will be promptly made to MoDOT. FHWA will notify any Indian tribe that might attach cultural affiliation to the identified remains as soon as possible after their identification. FHWA shall take into account Tribal recommendations regarding treatment of the remains and proposed actions, and then direct MoDOT HP to carry-out the appropriate actions in consultation with the SHPO. MoDOT shall monitor the handling of any such human remains and associated funerary objected, sacred object or objects of cultural patrimony in accordance with the Missouri Unmarked Human Burial Sites Act, §§ 194.400 – 194.410, RSMo.		If human remains are encountered during construction, the contractor shall immediately stop all work within a 330-foot radius of the remains and shall not resume without specific authorization from MoDOT HP Staff, and either the SHPO or the local law enforcement officer, whichever party has jurisdiction over and responsibility for such remains. The contractor shall notify the MoDOT Construction Inspector and/or Resident Engineer who will contact the MoDOT HP section within 24 hours of the discovery. MoDOT HP staff will immediately notify the local law enforcement (to ensure that it is not a crime scene) and the SHPO as per RSMo 194 or to notify SHPO what has occurred and that it is covered by Missouri’s Cemeteries Law, §§ 214. RSMo. MoDOT HP staff will notify FHWA that human remains have been encountered within 24 hours of being notified of the find. If, within 24 hours, the contractor is unable to contact appropriate MoDOT staff, the contractor shall initiate the involvement by local law enforcement and the SHPO. A description of the contractor’s actions will be promptly made to MoDOT. FHWA will notify any Indian tribe that might attach cultural affiliation to the identified remains as soon as possible after their identification. FHWA shall take into account Tribal recommendations regarding treatment of the remains and proposed actions, and then direct MoDOT HP to carry-out the appropriate actions in consultation with the SHPO. MoDOT shall monitor the handling of any such human remains and associated funerary objected, sacred object or objects of cultural patrimony in accordance with the Missouri Unmarked Human Burial Sites Act, §§ 194.400 – 194.410, RSMo.

	==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==		==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==

Hoskir: /* 127.2.2 Historic Preservation Staff */ removed sharepoint link

2024-07-22T16:09:18Z

127.2.2 Historic Preservation Staff: removed sharepoint link

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 22 July 2024
Line 53:		Line 53:

	==127.2.2 Historic Preservation Staff==		==127.2.2 Historic Preservation Staff==
	The ~~[http://epg.modot.org/files/1/1d/127.2_staff_2016.pdf~~ MoDOT Historic Preservation staff] is part of the Central Office Design Division. Staff archaeologists handle issues regarding archeological resources, while the architectural historians handle issues involving buildings, structures, culverts and bridges. The historic preservation staff also a computer graphics specialist who modify project plans for submittal to other agencies. The MoDOT historic preservation staff conducts cultural resources investigations, prepares recommendations based on these investigations, and reviews cultural resources work done by consultants. The Historic Preservation staff is also available to assist with public interaction including providing presentations or displays at public meetings or preparing brochures or handouts.		The MoDOT Historic Preservation staff is part of the Central Office Design Division. Staff archaeologists handle issues regarding archeological resources, while the architectural historians handle issues involving buildings, structures, culverts and bridges. The historic preservation staff also a computer graphics specialist who modify project plans for submittal to other agencies. The MoDOT historic preservation staff conducts cultural resources investigations, prepares recommendations based on these investigations, and reviews cultural resources work done by consultants. The Historic Preservation staff is also available to assist with public interaction including providing presentations or displays at public meetings or preparing brochures or handouts.

	==127.2.3 Historic Preservation Regulations and Laws==		==127.2.3 Historic Preservation Regulations and Laws==

Hoskir: /* 127.2.6 How does the District Initiate Section 106 Compliance */ updated per RR3739

2023-07-26T20:51:13Z

127.2.6 How does the District Initiate Section 106 Compliance: updated per RR3739

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 26 July 2023
Line 147:		Line 147:
	The submission by the Historic Preservation Section to the SHPO for project clearance minimally requires the project footprint on a topographic map. Most submissions also require a set of the project plans provided electronically for our graphic support staff to annotate with the results of our investigation. Photographs of a project area or specific resources (most often buildings or bridges) also may be requested from the district.		The submission by the Historic Preservation Section to the SHPO for project clearance minimally requires the project footprint on a topographic map. Most submissions also require a set of the project plans provided electronically for our graphic support staff to annotate with the results of our investigation. Photographs of a project area or specific resources (most often buildings or bridges) also may be requested from the district.

	It is the district’s responsibility to contact the landowner or tenant to obtain the right of ingress for Historic Preservation staff to conduct a cultural resources survey. The project manager should verify with the historic preservation and environmental staff to verify if there are parcels that access is not required. The project manager provides a written list (e-mail is acceptable) of landowners with their phone number, permission status (ingress allowed, denied, or unknown) to the archaeologist or architectural historian handling the job. A [[media:~~127.2.6_sample_letter~~.docx\|sample letter requesting permission]] and a [[media:127.2.6_brochure.pdf\|brochure]] showing a typical survey are provided. For any specific questions by a landowner, MoDOT historic preservation staff will make follow-up contacts.		It is the district’s responsibility to contact the landowner or tenant to obtain the right of ingress for Historic Preservation staff to conduct a cultural resources survey. The project manager should verify with the historic preservation and environmental staff to verify if there are parcels that access is not required. The project manager provides a written list (e-mail is acceptable) of landowners with their phone number, permission status (ingress allowed, denied, or unknown) to the archaeologist or architectural historian handling the job. A [[media:Property_Permission_Letter_E-HP_sample-07-23.docx\|sample letter requesting permission]] and a [[media:127.2.6_brochure.pdf\|brochure]] showing a typical survey are provided. For any specific questions by a landowner, MoDOT historic preservation staff will make follow-up contacts.

	:* During the ''Location/Conceptual Stage'', the HP staff should be consulted to determine if the project is a Section 106 undertaking, and if so, initiate the Section 106 process. The Section 106 process can be completed at this stage for certain projects that are considered “Minor Highway Projects” as per executed agreement documents. A change of the scope (e.g., type of project, later addition of right-of-way and/or easements, etc.) may remove a project from an earlier finding under this PA.		:* During the ''Location/Conceptual Stage'', the HP staff should be consulted to determine if the project is a Section 106 undertaking, and if so, initiate the Section 106 process. The Section 106 process can be completed at this stage for certain projects that are considered “Minor Highway Projects” as per executed agreement documents. A change of the scope (e.g., type of project, later addition of right-of-way and/or easements, etc.) may remove a project from an earlier finding under this PA.
Line 161:		Line 161:
	::o ''Job Special Provisions (JSP'') – Some jobs may require a JSP to the construction contract to guarantee that commitments made in the Section 106 agreement document or NEPA documentation to protect cultural resources from collateral damage that may occur during construction or carried out (e.g., monitoring construction, avoidance of certain areas within the job boundaries, etc.). The HP staff will draft the job special provisions with assistance from the district design staff.		::o ''Job Special Provisions (JSP'') – Some jobs may require a JSP to the construction contract to guarantee that commitments made in the Section 106 agreement document or NEPA documentation to protect cultural resources from collateral damage that may occur during construction or carried out (e.g., monitoring construction, avoidance of certain areas within the job boundaries, etc.). The HP staff will draft the job special provisions with assistance from the district design staff.

	The release of Federal funds by FHWA requires that the Section 106 process has been completed (i.e., the presence of historic properties and project effects upon any historic property(s) has been completed and SHPO has concurred with the finding).		The release of Federal funds by FHWA requires that the Section 106 process has been completed (i.e., the presence of historic properties and project effects upon any historic property(s) has been completed and SHPO has concurred with the finding).

	==127.2.7 Confidentiality of Archaeological Site Locations==		==127.2.7 Confidentiality of Archaeological Site Locations==

Smithk: Per Env'l, updated broken links

2022-05-03T19:33:29Z

Per Env'l, updated broken links

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:33, 3 May 2022
Line 147:		Line 147:
	The submission by the Historic Preservation Section to the SHPO for project clearance minimally requires the project footprint on a topographic map. Most submissions also require a set of the project plans provided electronically for our graphic support staff to annotate with the results of our investigation. Photographs of a project area or specific resources (most often buildings or bridges) also may be requested from the district.		The submission by the Historic Preservation Section to the SHPO for project clearance minimally requires the project footprint on a topographic map. Most submissions also require a set of the project plans provided electronically for our graphic support staff to annotate with the results of our investigation. Photographs of a project area or specific resources (most often buildings or bridges) also may be requested from the district.

	It is the district’s responsibility to contact the landowner or tenant to obtain the right of ingress for Historic Preservation staff to conduct a cultural resources survey. The project manager should verify with the historic preservation and environmental staff to verify if there are parcels that access is not required. The project manager provides a written list (e-mail is acceptable) of landowners with their phone number, permission status (ingress allowed, denied, or unknown) to the archaeologist or architectural historian handling the job. A [~~http~~:~~//epg~~.~~modot~~.~~org/files/d/d6/Sample_Permission_letter~~.~~doc~~ sample letter requesting permission] and a [~~http~~:~~//epg~~.~~modot~~.~~org/files/8/80/Survey~~.pdf brochure] showing a typical survey are provided. For any specific questions by a landowner, MoDOT historic preservation staff will make follow-up contacts.		It is the district’s responsibility to contact the landowner or tenant to obtain the right of ingress for Historic Preservation staff to conduct a cultural resources survey. The project manager should verify with the historic preservation and environmental staff to verify if there are parcels that access is not required. The project manager provides a written list (e-mail is acceptable) of landowners with their phone number, permission status (ingress allowed, denied, or unknown) to the archaeologist or architectural historian handling the job. A [[media:127.2.6_sample_letter.docx\|sample letter requesting permission]] and a [[media:127.2.6_brochure.pdf\|brochure]] showing a typical survey are provided. For any specific questions by a landowner, MoDOT historic preservation staff will make follow-up contacts.

	:* During the ''Location/Conceptual Stage'', the HP staff should be consulted to determine if the project is a Section 106 undertaking, and if so, initiate the Section 106 process. The Section 106 process can be completed at this stage for certain projects that are considered “Minor Highway Projects” as per executed agreement documents. A change of the scope (e.g., type of project, later addition of right-of-way and/or easements, etc.) may remove a project from an earlier finding under this PA.		:* During the ''Location/Conceptual Stage'', the HP staff should be consulted to determine if the project is a Section 106 undertaking, and if so, initiate the Section 106 process. The Section 106 process can be completed at this stage for certain projects that are considered “Minor Highway Projects” as per executed agreement documents. A change of the scope (e.g., type of project, later addition of right-of-way and/or easements, etc.) may remove a project from an earlier finding under this PA.

Smithk: /* 127.2.5 Approximate Timelines for Section 106 Compliance */ Per Env'l, Clarifying the timelines for completing the Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act review process

2022-04-05T20:11:19Z

127.2.5 Approximate Timelines for Section 106 Compliance: Per Env'l, Clarifying the timelines for completing the Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act review process

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 5 April 2022
Line 138:		Line 138:
	:* Archaeological sites that need Phase II testing can add 1 to 3 months to the process – the timeline to compete the '''Section 106 process is 4-6 months.'''		:* Archaeological sites that need Phase II testing can add 1 to 3 months to the process – the timeline to compete the '''Section 106 process is 4-6 months.'''
	:* An adversely affected historic property will take an additional 4-6 months to negotiate and draft an agreement document (Memorandum of Agreement or Programmatic Agreement); the agreement document needs to be executed before NEPA is approved – the timeline to complete the '''Section 106 process is 8-12 months.'''		:* An adversely affected historic property will take an additional 4-6 months to negotiate and draft an agreement document (Memorandum of Agreement or Programmatic Agreement); the agreement document needs to be executed before NEPA is approved – the timeline to complete the '''Section 106 process is 8-12 months.'''
	:* The mitigation efforts to resolve the adverse effects upon a historic property as laid out in the agreement document stipulations ~~can take 1-6 months and most~~ need to be completed before the project can be advertised for construction bids (~~some~~ can ~~occur during or after construction)~~ – the timeline to complete the '''Section 106 process is 9-18 months.'''		:* The mitigation efforts to resolve the adverse effects upon a historic property as laid out in the agreement document stipulations include “field” mitigation efforts that need to be completed before the project can be advertised for construction bids (for example, excavations at archaeological sites, bridge photography, etc.). These field mitigation efforts can take 1-6 months to complete – the timeline to complete the '''Section 106 process is 9-18 months.'''
	:* ~~An adversely affected~~ historic property that ~~requires~~ an ~~individual~~ Section 4(f) ~~evaluation~~, ~~this~~ will ~~require an '''additional 6~~-12 months ~~after~~ the Section 106 process is completed.~~'''~~		:* If a project has an adverse effect on a historic property that is also a Section 4(f) property, a Section 4(f) Evaluation will need to be completed. Bridges have a nationwide programmatic Section 4(f) evaluation, which streamlines the process. If an Individual Section 4(f) Evaluation is required, anticipate that the process will take 12-15 months. Some portions of the Section 4(f) can be completed concurrently with the Section 106 consultation and resolution of adverse effects. The use of a Section 4(f) property cannot be approved by FHWA until the Section 4(f) Evaluation and the Section 106 process is completed.
	:* For a '''Design-Build Project''', if a historic property is identified in the area of potential effects and an effect determination can’t be made due to lack of a design or a commitment can’t be made to avoid the historic property, an executed Programmatic Agreement will be required to advance the Section 106 process and to complete the NEPA evaluation.		:* For a '''Design-Build Project''', if a historic property is identified in the area of potential effects and an effect determination can’t be made due to lack of a design or a commitment can’t be made to avoid the historic property, an executed Programmatic Agreement will be required to advance the Section 106 process and to complete the NEPA evaluation.

	~~Approximately 80% of the projects will receive Section 106 clearance 6 months after establishing a project’s footprint and receiving landowner permission.~~

	==127.2.6 How does the District Initiate [https://ecfr.io/Title-36/cfr800_main Section 106] Compliance==		==127.2.6 How does the District Initiate [https://ecfr.io/Title-36/cfr800_main Section 106] Compliance==

Smithk: /* 127.2.9 Construction Inspection Guidance */ Per Env'l, added numbers for ease of reference

2021-09-15T18:07:12Z

127.2.9 Construction Inspection Guidance: Per Env'l, added numbers for ease of reference

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 15 September 2021
Line 245:		Line 245:
	[http://www.modot.org/business/standards_and_specs/SpecbookEPG.pdf#page=4 Sec. 107.8.2] and [http://www.modot.org/business/standards_and_specs/SpecbookEPG.pdf#page=5 Sec. 203.4.8] of the ''Missouri Standard Specifications for Highway Construction'' require the contractor to take steps to preserve any such artifacts that may be encountered and to notify the MoDOT Construction Inspector or Resident Engineer of their presence. If it is necessary to discontinue operations in a particular area to preserve such objects, this section of the specifications is basis for a work suspension. In order to ensure compliance with applicable state laws, the MoDOT Construction Inspector or Resident Engineer cannot release remains or artifacts or allow the contractor to disturb the area within the 50-ft. buffer space around these discovered items, until after consultation with MoDOT HP staff and until after all applicable requirements from FHWA or SHPO have been addressed.		[http://www.modot.org/business/standards_and_specs/SpecbookEPG.pdf#page=4 Sec. 107.8.2] and [http://www.modot.org/business/standards_and_specs/SpecbookEPG.pdf#page=5 Sec. 203.4.8] of the ''Missouri Standard Specifications for Highway Construction'' require the contractor to take steps to preserve any such artifacts that may be encountered and to notify the MoDOT Construction Inspector or Resident Engineer of their presence. If it is necessary to discontinue operations in a particular area to preserve such objects, this section of the specifications is basis for a work suspension. In order to ensure compliance with applicable state laws, the MoDOT Construction Inspector or Resident Engineer cannot release remains or artifacts or allow the contractor to disturb the area within the 50-ft. buffer space around these discovered items, until after consultation with MoDOT HP staff and until after all applicable requirements from FHWA or SHPO have been addressed.

	~~'''~~If cultural resources are encountered during construction~~'''~~ the contractor shall immediately stop all work within a 50-foot buffer around the limits of the resource and shall not resume without specific authorization from a MoDOT Historic Preservation Specialist. The contractor shall notify the MoDOT Resident Engineer or Construction Inspector, who shall contact the MoDOT HP within 24 hours of the discovery. MoDOT HP shall contact FHWA and SHPO within 48 hours of learning of the discovery and provide an evaluation of the resource and reasonable efforts to see if it can be avoided. FHWA shall make an eligibility and effects determination based upon the preliminary evaluation and consul with MoDOT, and SHPO a minimize or mitigate any adverse effect. FHWA will notify the Council and any tribes that might attach religious and/or cultural significance to the property within 48 hours of this determination. FHWA shall take into account Council and Tribal recommendations regarding the eligibility of the property and proposed actions, and direct MoDOT to carry out the appropriate actions. MoDOT will provide FHWA and SHPO with a report of the actions when they are completed. FHWA shall provide this report to the council and the tribes.		===127.2.9.1 Cultural Resources Encountered During Construction===
			If cultural resources are encountered during construction, the contractor shall immediately stop all work within a 50-foot buffer around the limits of the resource and shall not resume without specific authorization from a MoDOT Historic Preservation Specialist. The contractor shall notify the MoDOT Resident Engineer or Construction Inspector, who shall contact the MoDOT HP within 24 hours of the discovery. MoDOT HP shall contact FHWA and SHPO within 48 hours of learning of the discovery and provide an evaluation of the resource and reasonable efforts to see if it can be avoided. FHWA shall make an eligibility and effects determination based upon the preliminary evaluation and consul with MoDOT, and SHPO a minimize or mitigate any adverse effect. FHWA will notify the Council and any tribes that might attach religious and/or cultural significance to the property within 48 hours of this determination. FHWA shall take into account Council and Tribal recommendations regarding the eligibility of the property and proposed actions, and direct MoDOT to carry out the appropriate actions. MoDOT will provide FHWA and SHPO with a report of the actions when they are completed. FHWA shall provide this report to the council and the tribes.

	~~'''~~If human remains are encountered during construction~~'''~~, the contractor shall immediately stop all work within a 50-foot radius of the remains and shall not resume without specific authorization from either the SHPO or the local law enforcement officer, whichever party has jurisdiction over and responsibility for such remains. The contractor shall notify the MoDOT Construction Inspector and/or Resident Engineer who will contact the MoDOT HP section within 24 hours of the discovery. MoDOT HP staff will immediately notify the local law enforcement (to ensure that it is not a crime scene) and the SHPO as per RSMo 194 or to notify SHPO what has occurred and that it is covered by Missouri’s Cemeteries Law, §§ 214. RSMo. MoDOT HP staff will notify FHWA that human remains have been encountered within 24 hours of being notified of the find. If, within 24 hours, the contractor is unable to contact appropriate MoDOT staff, the contractor shall initiate the involvement by local law enforcement and the SHPO. A description of the contractor’s actions will be promptly made to MoDOT. FHWA will notify any Indian tribe that might attach cultural affiliation to the identified remains as soon as possible after their identification. FHWA shall take into account Tribal recommendations regarding treatment of the remains and proposed actions, and then direct MoDOT HP to carry-out the appropriate actions in consultation with the SHPO. MoDOT shall monitor the handling of any such human remains and associated funerary objected, sacred object or objects of cultural patrimony in accordance with the Missouri Unmarked Human Burial Sites Act, §§ 194.400 – 194.410, RSMo.		===127.2.9.2 Human Remains Encountered During Construction===
			If human remains are encountered during construction, the contractor shall immediately stop all work within a 50-foot radius of the remains and shall not resume without specific authorization from either the SHPO or the local law enforcement officer, whichever party has jurisdiction over and responsibility for such remains. The contractor shall notify the MoDOT Construction Inspector and/or Resident Engineer who will contact the MoDOT HP section within 24 hours of the discovery. MoDOT HP staff will immediately notify the local law enforcement (to ensure that it is not a crime scene) and the SHPO as per RSMo 194 or to notify SHPO what has occurred and that it is covered by Missouri’s Cemeteries Law, §§ 214. RSMo. MoDOT HP staff will notify FHWA that human remains have been encountered within 24 hours of being notified of the find. If, within 24 hours, the contractor is unable to contact appropriate MoDOT staff, the contractor shall initiate the involvement by local law enforcement and the SHPO. A description of the contractor’s actions will be promptly made to MoDOT. FHWA will notify any Indian tribe that might attach cultural affiliation to the identified remains as soon as possible after their identification. FHWA shall take into account Tribal recommendations regarding treatment of the remains and proposed actions, and then direct MoDOT HP to carry-out the appropriate actions in consultation with the SHPO. MoDOT shall monitor the handling of any such human remains and associated funerary objected, sacred object or objects of cultural patrimony in accordance with the Missouri Unmarked Human Burial Sites Act, §§ 194.400 – 194.410, RSMo.

	==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==		==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==

Smithk at 12:53, 30 March 2021

2021-03-30T12:53:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:53, 30 March 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]		\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[http://sp/sites/DE/environmental_historic_pres/Shared ~~Documents~~/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FDE%2Fenvironmental%5Fhistoric%5Fpres%2FShared%20Documents%2FHistoricBridgeInventory&FolderCTID=0x0120008AD5F6AB07EC7C40A28041CBD4D69592&View=%7BAAE47A11%2D3349%2D48D6%2DB930%2D913EB12A229F%7D Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]		\|[http://sp/sites/DE/environmental_historic_pres/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FDE%2Fenvironmental%5Fhistoric%5Fpres%2FShared%20Documents%2FHistoricBridgeInventory&FolderCTID=0x0120008AD5F6AB07EC7C40A28041CBD4D69592&View=%7BAAE47A11%2D3349%2D48D6%2DB930%2D913EB12A229F%7D Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]		\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]
Line 250:		Line 250:

	==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==		==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==
	There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [http://sp/sites/DE/environmental_historic_pres/Shared ~~Documents~~/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FDE%2Fenvironmental%5Fhistoric%5Fpres%2FShared%20Documents%2FHistoricBridgeInventory&FolderCTID=0x0120008AD5F6AB07EC7C40A28041CBD4D69592&View=%7BAAE47A11%2D3349%2D48D6%2DB930%2D913EB12A229F%7D Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.		There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [http://sp/sites/DE/environmental_historic_pres/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FDE%2Fenvironmental%5Fhistoric%5Fpres%2FShared%20Documents%2FHistoricBridgeInventory&FolderCTID=0x0120008AD5F6AB07EC7C40A28041CBD4D69592&View=%7BAAE47A11%2D3349%2D48D6%2DB930%2D913EB12A229F%7D Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.

	Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.		Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.

Smithk: Per Env'l, updated Mo Historic Bridge Inventory links

2021-03-30T12:49:40Z

Per Env'l, updated Mo Historic Bridge Inventory links

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:49, 30 March 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]		\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[http://~~epg.modot.mo.gov~~/~~documents~~/~~Historic_Bridge_Inventory~~/ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]		\|[http://sp/sites/DE/environmental_historic_pres/Shared Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FDE%2Fenvironmental%5Fhistoric%5Fpres%2FShared%20Documents%2FHistoricBridgeInventory&FolderCTID=0x0120008AD5F6AB07EC7C40A28041CBD4D69592&View=%7BAAE47A11%2D3349%2D48D6%2DB930%2D913EB12A229F%7D Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]		\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]
Line 250:		Line 250:

	==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==		==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==
	There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [http://~~epg.modot.mo.gov~~/~~documents~~/~~Historic_Bridge_Inventory~~/ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.		There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [http://sp/sites/DE/environmental_historic_pres/Shared Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FDE%2Fenvironmental%5Fhistoric%5Fpres%2FShared%20Documents%2FHistoricBridgeInventory&FolderCTID=0x0120008AD5F6AB07EC7C40A28041CBD4D69592&View=%7BAAE47A11%2D3349%2D48D6%2DB930%2D913EB12A229F%7D Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.

	Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.		Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.

Smithk: Per Env'l, archaic link restored until further notice

2021-03-29T16:21:30Z

Per Env'l, archaic link restored until further notice

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 29 March 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]		\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]		\|[http://epg.modot.mo.gov/documents/Historic_Bridge_Inventory/ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]		\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]
Line 250:		Line 250:

	==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==		==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==
	There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.		There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [http://epg.modot.mo.gov/documents/Historic_Bridge_Inventory/ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.

	Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.		Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.

Smithk at 16:12, 29 March 2021

2021-03-29T16:12:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 29 March 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]		\|[[:Category:139 Design - Build#139.6 Design-Build and the Environmental Process\| Design-Build]]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[~~\\ghdata022\ghq_public\Daniels_Karen\HistoricBridgeInventory~~ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]		\|[ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory]
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]		\|[[media:127.2 Missouri Historic Bridge List.xlsx\|Missouri Historic Bridge List]]
Line 250:		Line 250:

	==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==		==127.2.10 Historic Bridge Information==
	There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [~~\\ghdata022\ghq_public\Daniels_Karen\HistoricBridgeInventory~~ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.		There are about 24,000 bridges in the state (state, county and city bridges). The 1996 [ Missouri Historic Bridge Inventory] survey evaluated approximately 11,000 of them that were built before 1951. About 1,800 of these had some potential for NRHP eligibility and were researched in more detail. Of these, 399 were considered possibly eligible, eligible or listed on the NRHP. In 2003, a Programmatic Agreement between the MoDOT, FHWA, [http://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/index.html State Historic Preservation Office] and [http://www.achp.gov/ Advisory Council on Historic Preservation] accepted the results of Fraser’s 1996 survey and the 399 most significant bridges became the [http://epg.modot.org/files/8/87/127.2_Missouri_Historic_Bridge_List.xlsx Missouri Historic Bridge List] (with some modifications). That same year the Missouri Historic Bridge Management Plan outlined a strategy for dealing with historic bridges on the list.

	Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.		Additional information on individual bridges can be found at [http://bridgehunter.com/mo/ BridgeHunter.com]. Also, [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf ''Context for Common Historic Bridge Types''] is available for reference.