Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Engineering_Policy_Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Smithk (talk | contribs)
m article construction
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Engineering Policy Guide.jpg|center]]
__NOTOC__
<div style="padding-bottom: .3em; margin: 0 .5em .5em"></div>
<div style="margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; background-color:black; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888; border:1px solid black">
{| cellspacing="3"  
<center>
|- valign="top" width="100%"
<div class="jcarousel-wrapper" style="margin-top:7px; margin-bottom:0px">
|style="border: 1px solid #696969; color: #000; background-color: #A9A9A9"|<big><center>'''<font color = "white"><i>WELCOME'''</i></font color="white"></center></big>
<div class="jcarousel jcarousel-randomize">
| valign="top" width="60%" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" style="border: 1px solid #FF8C00; background:#FFA500" align="center"|'''<big><font color="white"><i>RECENT POLICY CHANGES IN THE EPG</i></font color="white"></big>'''
    <div class="jcarousel-list">
        <div class="jcarousel-item">
{{banner|direction=left|width=20%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-001.png}}
        </div>
        <div class="jcarousel-item">
{{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-002.png}}
        </div>
        <div class="jcarousel-item">
{{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-007.png}}
        </div>
        <div class="jcarousel-item">
{{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-004.png}}
        </div>
        <div class="jcarousel-item">
{{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-005.png}}
        </div>
        <div class="jcarousel-item">
{{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-006.png}}
        </div>
        <div class="jcarousel-item">
{{banner|direction=left|width=40%||section=Engineering Policy Guide|section-link=Main Page|image=EPG-003.png}}
        </div>
    </div>
</div>
</div>
</center>
</div>
 
{| style="text-align:center; margin-top:12px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; font-style:italic; font-size:20px; font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif !important;"
|-
|-
|valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #A9A9A9; color: #000; background-color: #F8F8FF"|MoDOT has made great strides to build a good transportation system and increase taxpayers' trust in its ability to deliver what was promised. Innovative concepts, such as [http://www.modot.mo.gov/business/PracticalDesign.htm practical design] and [[:Category:139 Design - Build|design-build]], were used to deliver those commitments and have made MoDOT a leader in the transportation industry. 
! style="padding-left:90px; padding-right:90px; |
----
Our mission is to provide a world-class transportation system that is</br>safe, innovative, reliable and dedicated to a prosperous Missouri.
----
|}


These forward-thinking, innovative concepts are reflected in the ''ENGINEERING POLICY GUIDE'' (EPG).  This document provides a single reference for all engineering and engineering-related guidance by combining the former [http://wwwi/intranet/rw/ Right of Way], [http://wwwi/design/default.htm Design], [http://wwwi/intranet/br/default.htm Bridge], [http://wwwi/intranet/cm/ Construction], [http://wwwi/intranet/tr/ Traffic] and [http://wwwi/maintenance/ Maintenance] manuals.
{| style="width:100%; text-align:center; margin-top:0px;"
|-
| [[image:Google search.png|200px|bottom|link=https://epg.modot.org/modot/EPG_GoogleSearch.html]]
| [[image:recent_changes.png|200px|bottom|link=Recent Policy Changes in the EPG]]
| [[image:TA_image.png|200px|bottom|link=616.8_Typical_Applications_(MUTCD_6H)#616.8.2.1_Typical_Applications]]
| [[image:MASH_Info.png|200px|bottom|link=https://epg.modot.org/files/c/ce/MASH_Implementation.pdf]]
|-
|}


MediaWiki, the engine behind the Wikipedia on the World Wide Web, is the software delivering the EPGMillions of hits on the EPG endorse this format to be easy to navigate and pleasing to read. A small [[:Help:Contents|'''HELP ARTICLE''']] is included to assist with helpful hints on how to use the EPG as well as other points of interest.
<div style="margin-top:12px; font-size:95%; padding:5px; border:1px solid black;background-color:white; color:black; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888">
|valign="top" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border: 1px solid #FFA500; background:#ffdead"|'''New Right of Way Guidance'''
<b>MoDOT’s three pillars of “Safety, Service and Stability” steer our leadership and employees.  Our commitment to safety includes keeping both customers and ourselves safe.  Our service includes providing outstanding customer service, delivering transportation solutions of great value and using resources wiselyKeeping roads and bridges in good condition, operating a reliable and convenient transportation system, and advancing Missouri’s economic development reflect our commitment to stability.<br/>Innovative concepts, such as [[:Category:143 Practical Design|Practical Design]] and [[:Category:139 Design - Build|design-build]], are used to deliver our commitments.  These and other forward-thinking concepts shape the content of the ENGINEERING POLICY GUIDE (EPG). This document provides a single reference for all engineering and engineering-related [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/br Bridge], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/cm Construction], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/DE/ Design], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/ts Highway Safety & Traffic], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/mt Maintenance], [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/tp Planning] and [https://modotgov.sharepoint.com/sites/DE/SitePages/Right-of-Way.aspx Right of Way] guidance.</b>
</div>


8/14/09: Additional [[236.6 Appraisal and Appraisal Review#Costs to Cure|costs to cure]] guidance is available; additional guidance for the use of Form 238.2.17 in [[236.4 Description Writing and Titles#236.4.6.2 Methods of Legally Describing the Fee or Portion Thereof|EPG 236.4.6.2]] and [[236.7 Negotiation#236.7.2.21 Acquisition by Condemnation|236.7.2.21]]; and additional guidance for [[236.5 Property Management#236.5.15 Methods for Disposal|Methods of Disposal]] and new guidance about the [[236.5 Property Management#236.5.21.7 Full Disclosure Clause|Full Disclosure Clause]].
{| style="width:100%; text-align:center; margin-top:12px;"
 
|-
'''[[102.2 Contractor Performance Rating System#102.2.5 Contractor Recognition|102.2.5 Contractor Recognition]]'''
| [[image:Broken link.png|200px|bottom|link=mailto:engineering.policy@modot.mo.gov?Subject=Report%20a%20broken%20link&Body=Please%20include%20the%20broken%20link,%20article%20number%20and%20a%20screenshot%20if%20possible]]
 
| [[image:Approval process.png|200px|bottom|link=Help_Article#EPS_Approval_Process]]
8/7/09: An additional qualifier has been added for contractors to receive awards.
| [[image:E-update.png|200px|bottom|link=Help_article#Signing_Up_for_E-Updates]]
 
|-
'''Electronic Design Data Delivery'''
|}
 
8/05/09:  Formats for coordinate geometry files were specified in [[237.14 Electronic Design Data Delivery#237.14.1.2 Geopak Coordinate Database (a.k.a. GPK File)|237.14.1.2 Geopak Coordinate Database (a.k.a. GPK File)]] and an electronic design data file size limitation was specified in [[237.14 Electronic Design Data Delivery#237.14.1.9 Method of Delivery|237.14.1.9 Method of Delivery]].
 
'''[[902.11 Other Design Aspects of Traffic Signals#Table 902.11.11.2.1 Properties for Conductors|Power Cable Tables 902.11.11.2.1 and 902.11.11.2.2]]'''
 
8/04/09:  The minimum conductor size for power cable is now #8 AWG.
 
'''TM 53 de-activated'''
 
8/3/09: [[106.7.53 TM-53, Determination of Moisture Content of Bituminous Mixtures| TM-53, Determination of Moisture Content of Bituminous Mixtures]] was replaced with AASHTO T 329. 
 
'''Payment Documentation Policy'''
 
7/31/09: The former EPG 109.1 Payment Documentation article has been updated and consolidated with the former EPG 109 Measurement and Payment article to become the new [[:Category:109 Payment Documentation Policy|EPG 109 Payment Documentation Policy]].
 
'''[[806.8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)|Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)]]'''
 
7/28/09: The SWPPP article info moved to its new location: [[806.8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)|EPG 806.8]].  Also, when to [[806.8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)#806.8.4 Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (MO Specifications Division 800)|perform post-runoff inspections]] was clarified, [[806.8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)#806.8.4.2.3 Ditch Checks|ditch checks added]] and new [[806.8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)#806.8.4.2.7 Inlet Controls|inlet control]], [[806.8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)#806.8.4.2.8 Erosion Stabilization Mats and Blankets|erosion stabilization mats and blankets]] and [[806.8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)#806.8.4.2.12 Compost Filter Berms|compost filter berms]] guidance was added.
 
'''[[626.4 Transverse Rumble Strips|626.4 Transverse Rumble Strips''']]
 
7/22/09: A new article is available to provide guidance for transverse rumble strips.
 
'''238.2 Land Surveying'''
 
7/22/09: New guidance is available for [[238.2 Land Surveying#238.2.14.1 Monumenting Landowner's Property Lines When Requested|monumenting landowner's property lines]] and [[238.2 Land Surveying#238.2.18.6 Recording the Location Survey Plan|recording the Location Survey Plan]].  [[238.2 Land Surveying#238.2.17 Professional Land Surveyor Review|Professional Land Surveyor Review]] guidance has also replaced old District Responsibility guidance.  The Professional Land Surveyor Description Review Form and the Plat Review Checklist are now available.
 
[[:Category:137 Construction Inspection Guidance for Records to be Maintained#137.9.3 Payment Estimates|'''137.9.3 Payment Estimates''']]
 
7/16/09: New payment guidance for the Resident Engineer's diary has been added.
 
[[910.3 Dynamic Message Signs (DMS)#910.3.2.3 Message Priorities|'''DMS Message Priorities''']]
 
7/14/09: Traffic has added DMS Message Request Guidelines to item no. 9.
 
[[236.5 Property Management|'''236.5 Property Management''']]
 
6/29/09: This article has been totally rewritten.  Please review this new information.
 
'''Flags and Advance Warning Rail System (AWRS)'''
 
6/17/09:  The guidance for flags and Advance Warning Rail System (AWRS) has been clarified in [[616.2 Work Zone Signing and Applications#616.2.9 Flags and Advance Warning Rail System|616.2 Work Zone Signing and Applications]] and [[616.23 Traffic Control for Field Operations|616.23 Traffic Control for Field Operations]].  [[media:616 Sign and Device Legend, june 17 09.pdf|Fig. 616]] was updated to show the correct flag applications.
 
[[:Category:409 Seal Coat|'''Seal Coats''']]
 
6/16/09: Revised to reflect Standard Specification 409 revisions that require chip seals to have a dark appearance. Also Grade C aggregate quality is to be used for all shoulder applications.
 
[[750.7 Non-Hydraulic Considerations#750.7.5 End Treatment|'''Culvert End Treatment''']]
 
6/15/09: The minimum size requirement for Safety Slope End Sections has been increased, allowing increased use of Flared End Sections and Beveled End Treatment.
 
'''Stay-In-Place Forms'''
 
6/15/09: Note B.32 in bridge [[751.50 Standard Detailing Notes|Standard Detailing Notes]] was clarified to allow welding of stay-in-place forms by non-certified welders.
 
'''Guidance for ARRA Project Contract Plans'''
 
5/18/09:  [[:Category:237 Contract Plans#Guidance for ARRA Projects|Guidance for ARRA Projects]] has been provided.
 
'''New Guidance for Consultants' Electronic Format Plans'''
 
5/15/09:  New details to help consultants deliver plans in an electronic format are presented primarily at [[237.9 Submission of Plans and Supporting Documents#237.9.6.8 Consultant Designed Projects|237.9.6.8 Consultant Designed Projects]], but also at [[237.9 Submission of Plans and Supporting Documents#237.9.1 Final Design Plans Submittal|237.9.1 Final Design Plans Submittal]].
 
'''[[:Category:754 Bridge Engineering Assistance Program (BEAP)|754 Bridge Engineering Assistance Program (BEAP)]]'''
 
5/13/009:  The Bridge Engineering Assistance Program (BEAP) policies are now presented in EPG 754.  Only the location of the BEAP policies has changed, not the policies themselves.


'''Value Engineering Proposals'''
<div style="margin-top:12px; font-size:95%; padding:5px; border:1px solid black;background-color:white; color:black; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888">
<b>The design concepts and criteria within the Engineering Policy Guide (EPG) are intended for use when designing new construction projects on new locations or designing reconstruction projects on existing locations.  Projects on existing roadways call for a flexible, practical, and performance-based approach to design.  The EPG encourages flexible and practical design, which emphasizes the role of the planning and design teams in determining appropriate design dimensions based on project-specific conditions and existing and future roadway performance, more than on meeting specific nominal design criteria.  Although new design values and concepts may be presented throughout the EPG, this does not imply that existing roadways are unsafe, nor does it mandate the initiation of projects to improve existing roadways.  While the EPG does include nearly all engineering related aspects of roadway design and maintenance it is not all encompassing.  The use of properly equipped and maintained vehicles, operated by a capable user, is also pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of a transportation facility.</b>
</div>


5/6/09: A newly revised process for consideration of Value Engineering Proposals, including Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECP) and Practical Design Value Engineering Change Proposals (PDVECP) is now availableDetailed information is located in [[104.13 Construction Inspection Guidance for Sec 104|104.13 Construction Inspection Guidance for Sec 104]] and [[:Category:130 Value Engineering#130.2 Contractor initiated VECP’s|130 Value Engineering]].
<div style="margin-top:12px; background-color:black; color:white; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:5px 5px 5px #888888">
<center>'''The Engineering Policy Guide is maintained via the use of Microsoft EdgeFor optimal viewing quality, please choose Microsoft Edge for your browser.'''</center>
</div>

Latest revision as of 08:22, 12 December 2024


Our mission is to provide a world-class transportation system that is
safe, innovative, reliable and dedicated to a prosperous Missouri.


MoDOT’s three pillars of “Safety, Service and Stability” steer our leadership and employees. Our commitment to safety includes keeping both customers and ourselves safe. Our service includes providing outstanding customer service, delivering transportation solutions of great value and using resources wisely. Keeping roads and bridges in good condition, operating a reliable and convenient transportation system, and advancing Missouri’s economic development reflect our commitment to stability.
Innovative concepts, such as Practical Design and design-build, are used to deliver our commitments. These and other forward-thinking concepts shape the content of the ENGINEERING POLICY GUIDE (EPG). This document provides a single reference for all engineering and engineering-related Bridge, Construction, Design, Highway Safety & Traffic, Maintenance, Planning and Right of Way guidance.

The design concepts and criteria within the Engineering Policy Guide (EPG) are intended for use when designing new construction projects on new locations or designing reconstruction projects on existing locations. Projects on existing roadways call for a flexible, practical, and performance-based approach to design. The EPG encourages flexible and practical design, which emphasizes the role of the planning and design teams in determining appropriate design dimensions based on project-specific conditions and existing and future roadway performance, more than on meeting specific nominal design criteria. Although new design values and concepts may be presented throughout the EPG, this does not imply that existing roadways are unsafe, nor does it mandate the initiation of projects to improve existing roadways. While the EPG does include nearly all engineering related aspects of roadway design and maintenance it is not all encompassing. The use of properly equipped and maintained vehicles, operated by a capable user, is also pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of a transportation facility.

The Engineering Policy Guide is maintained via the use of Microsoft Edge. For optimal viewing quality, please choose Microsoft Edge for your browser.