|
|
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[image:135 historic.jpg|left|88px]]
| |
| − | {|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:7px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="240px" align="right"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |'''Forms'''
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[http://www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/780-1027-f.pdf Section 106 Project Information Form]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[http://www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/780-1718.pdf Section 106 Survey Form]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[http://www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/780-1718_inst.pdf Guide to the Completion of the SHPO Section 106 Survey Memo]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |'''Figure'''
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[[media:135.doc|Fig. 135, Generalized Flowchart of the Section 106 Process for LPAs]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |'''Quick Guide for EPG 135.2'''
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[[media:135.2 quick.pdf|Section 106 (Cultural Resources) Compliance]]
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | Section 106 Process guidance for Local Public Agencies is presented in [[#135.1 The Section 106 Process for Local Public Agencies|EPG 135.1]] while guidance for MoDOT staff is summarized in [[#135.2 The Section 106 Process for MoDOT Projects|EPG 135.2]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires potential impacts to significant cultural resources from any federally funded or permitted project to be considered. Cultural resources include archaeological sites, buildings, structures (e.g., bridges), objects or districts. The significance of a cultural resource is evaluated by applying a specific set of criteria that are set forth by the [http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/ National Register of Historic Places]. Cultural resources that meet the criteria of eligibility for listing on the National Register are referred to as “historic properties.” Failure to obtain Section 106 clearance could jeopardize federal funding and permits for a project. Section 106 encourages, but does not mandate, the preservation of historic properties. The goal of Section 106 is to ensure that preservation values are factored into the planning process for all federally funded or permitted projects.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The actual process for MoDOT varies from that of its off-system partners (the Local Public Agencies) because MoDOT employs qualified staff for conducting Section 106 review and has signed agreement documents with the Federal Highway Administration, the Missouri Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Even so, the Section 106 primary objectives are identical for both MoDOT and the LPAs:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :1. ''Identify historic properties.'' Determine project’s area of effect, identify historic properties, and evaluate historic significance,
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :2. ''Assess adverse effects.'' Assess if the project will have an adverse effect on historic properties, and
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :3. ''Resolve adverse effects.'' Avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation of any adverse effect on historic properties.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==135.1 The Section 106 Process for [[:Category:136 Local Public Agency (LPA) Policy|Local Public Agencies]]==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Additional information on Section 106 is provided in [[136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements|EPG 136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Step 1. Determine Need for Cultural Resource Investigations'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''The LPA should solicit the [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/shpo/sectionrev.htm State Historic Preservation Office’s] (SHPO) opinion on the need for a cultural resource survey by submitting a Section 106 Project Information Form. '''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The SHPO must be consulted on a federal-aid project as part of the Section 106 process. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or MoDOT may also be consulted on an as needed basis, but in almost all cases, the information for the SHPO can be prepared by LPA staff. The following data should be provided to the SHPO:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::'''A.''' [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/780-1718.pdf Section 106 Survey Memo (Project Information Form)].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::'''B.''' If a bridge is present, provide information on the bridge’s builder and the year built along with 3 in. x 5 in. or larger photographs (600 dpi if digital; photocopies are not acceptable) showing two views (side and end views). SHPO will also accept digital photos on a CD, especially if there are lots of images of both bridges and/or buildings.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::'''C.''' Provide clear photographs (see guidance above) of all buildings in the project area (see description in Step 2a.A. below), keyed to a project map. Include a brief history of buildings including construction dates (if known) and building uses.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::'''D.''' A relevant portion of USGS 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Map (1:24,000 scale) showing the location of the project and borrow sites is required. Maximum project (and/or borrow) limits should be delineated on the map, along with realignment of roadway if applicable. This map should show a buffer of about one mile beyond the limits of rural projects. An additional “close-up” view map of the project area may be necessary for small projects where the details are difficult to distinguish or for urban areas to better show adjacent buildings (aerial images from websites such as [http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl Google Maps] and [http://www.bing.com/maps/default.aspx?v=2&rtp=~&trfc=1 Bing Maps] can be used for this supportive information). USGS 7.5’ topographic maps can be downloads from the University of Missouri's [http://ims.missouri.edu/moims2008/ CARES Map Room].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If there are any questions about the information that is going to be submitted, the SHPO should be called for guidance. Sending in inadequate information could result in a SHPO response of “Your submittal did not include adequate information to review your project …”, which will require a resubmittal with the correct information. The SHPO review process does not officially begin until they have an acceptable submittal. The SHPO 30 day review process starts over each time additional information is submitted.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''SHPO reviews the submitted project information and offers an opinion as to whether further cultural resource investigations are required. '''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::'''A.''' SHPO reviews information and offers an opinion as to the need for a Cultural Resource Survey. SHPO has by law 30 calendar days to respond. If SHPO responds “no survey needed” or “no historic properties affected,” Section 106 requirements have been satisfied and no further Section 106 work is needed. The date of the SHPO letter would be used as the Section 106 compliance date.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::'''B.''' If SHPO recommends that a survey is necessary, a survey should be conducted using a cultural resource consultant or staff member (must meet the [http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_9.htm Secretary of Interior Standards]) to identify historical and/or archaeological resources that may be affected by the proposed project.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::'''C.''' If LPA does not agree with SHPO that a cultural resource survey is needed, FHWA shall be contacted to make a final determination on the need for a survey.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Step 2. Cultural Resource Investigations'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''If the SHPO requests a Section 106 survey the LPA will need to hire a qualified [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/shpo/consultants.htm cultural resource consultant] or staff member to conduct the survey and to submit a report of their findings to the SHPO.'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :'''Step 2a. The Cultural Resource Survey'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''A.''' Cultural resource surveys typically are limited to the area of potential effects (APE) (i.e., For archaeology, this is the maximum footprint of the project consisting of proposed and existing right of way, and permanent and temporary easements) and any off-site areas (e.g., borrow, staging, wasting, etc.) . For architectural resources, the APE may include the limits of the project plus a buffer around the project area so indirect effects of the project are considered (usually 50 ft. in urban settings and 100 ft. in rural settings).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''B.''' Reporting the results of the cultural resource survey should follow the SHPO [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/shpo/docs/MO_phase1_guide.pdf ''Guidelines for Phase I Archaeological Surveys and Reports'']. The standard method to submit the results is the [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/780-1718.pdf Section 106 Survey Memo]. Directions in completing this memo are provided on [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/780-1718_inst.pdf SHPO’s website].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''C.''' The Section 106 submittal will be reviewed and commented on by SHPO. SHPO has by law 30 calendar days to respond.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::1. If no cultural resources were identified, the SHPO usually will respond “no historic resources affected.” The Section 106 process is complete and no further action is necessary.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::2. If cultural resources were identified, their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) must be determined.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::3. In some cases, additional field investigations and /or historical research may be required for the cultural resource professional to determine resource eligibility.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::The SHPO comments only apply to the project as submitted. <u>Any changes</u> to the project may require a supplemental submittal to SHPO regarding these changes (e.g., project limits, significant modifications to the nature of the project, etc.). Any subsequent communication with SHPO should include the Project Number assigned by SHPO to the original submittal.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :'''Step 2b. Determination of Eligibility'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :'''If cultural resources are present, the LPA, in consultation with SHPO and FHWA, determines whether a cultural resource meets the eligibility requirements of the National Register. A cultural resource professional may need to conduct additional investigations to evaluate the eligibility of some resources. '''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Readily available information can often be used to determine the National Register eligibility of identified cultural resources. This information should consist of the results of the cultural resource survey, any subsequent investigations, or other available information such as pictures and available history of structures. If the adverse effects to the potentially National Register eligible cultural resource cannot be avoided by the project the National Register eligibility determination is included in the Section 106 submittal.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''A.''' The SHPO is requested to concur or disagree with the National Register eligibility of a cultural resource. The cultural resource professional should provide an assessment of resource eligibility.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''B.''' If SHPO, LPA, and FHWA agree that a cultural resource is not eligible for the National Register, the Section 106 process is complete. No further action is necessary.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''C.''' If SHPO, LPA, and FHWA agree that a cultural resource is eligible for the National Register, a determination of effect (Step 2c) is made next.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::1. If SHPO, LPA and FHWA disagree on the eligibility of a resource, the LPA should request the FHWA to contact the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places (Keeper) for a definitive opinion. If the FHWA decides that the Keeper needs to be consulted they will provide the LPA with a list of the required documentation. This process can be lengthy (up to six months), so it should be avoided if possible.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::2. If the Keeper finds that the resource is not eligible, the LPA no longer needs to consider the project’s effects to that specific resource.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :'''Step 2c. Determination of Effect'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :'''If historically significant cultural resources are present, the LPA, FHWA, and SHPO will determine the effect of the project on each National Register eligible property. '''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :The effect of a project on a National Register eligible property should be determined through consultation among the LPA, SHPO, and FHWA, using the criteria of adverse effects found at 36CFR800.4(1) and the examples of adverse effects found at 36CFR800.4(2). There will be a determination of either “no historic properties affected,” “no adverse effect” or “adverse effect.” The LPA will provide its opinion regarding effect along with its evaluation of eligibility to the SHPO for their concurrence. If the SHPO concurs with the LPA, this finding will be transmitted to the FHWA. If there is a disagreement among the LPA and SHPO, FHWA and MoDOT may be brought into the discussions to help facilitate an agreement.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''A.''' ''No Adverse Effect'' – If the finding is that the project effect is not adverse upon the historic property(ies), the Section 106 process is complete.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::'''B.''' ''Adverse Effect'' – If the project effect is adverse to the historic property(ies) (i.e., adversely affecting the characteristics that make it eligible for listing on the National Register), the LPA will consult with the SHPO on avoidance or mitigation of the adverse effect. It may be possible to redesign portions of the project to avoid adverse impacts to the historic property. The LPA will explore avoidance options, continued use, or rehabilitation of the historic property (not necessary for most archaeological sites). In addition, the public (interested parties, holders of permits, owners of affected lands, and private individuals) may be allowed to review and comment on the project, and participate in the decision-making process.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :If the SHPO concurs with the results of the Section 106 Survey submittal being “no historic properties affected” or “no adverse effect to a historic property,” Section 106 compliance is completed. The date of the SHPO letter would be used as the Section 106 compliance date. If the result of the survey is “adverse effect to a historic property” the LPA precedes with Steps 3 and 4.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Step 3. Preparation of the Memorandum of Agreement'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''If historic properties will be adversely affected by the project, the LPA will coordinate with SHPO and FHWA in preparation of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA).'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If adverse effects to a historic property cannot be avoided, a MOA will be prepared through consultation with LPA, FHWA, the SHPO, and other appropriate interested parties. The MOA will document the stipulations to be carried out to mitigate the adverse effect upon the historic property(ies). It is a legally binding agreement document that is signed by the signatory parties (usually the FHWA, SHPO and the LPA) (see [[136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements|EPG 136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements]]).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''Step 4. Mitigation of Adverse Effect'''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''The LPA will implement and fulfill the stipulations of the MOA. Ultimately, the SHPO must concur that the stipulations of the MOA have been satisfied. '''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Following the execution of the MOA, the LPA will implement stipulations of the MOA to mitigate the adverse effects upon the historic property(ies). The following mitigation measures have been used on various projects:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :'''A.''' ''Bridges and Architectural Resources:'' The LPA and FHWA consult with the SHPO to determine the level and kind of documentation required for the historic property: Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) documentation, Historic American Building Survey (HABS) standards, or a less formal state-level documentation. For most of these historic properties the state-level documentation is selected as the preferred method for recordation. By this point, public involvement has already been initiated to provide the public the opportunity to review and comment on project alternatives that involve a historic bridge. Generally bridges are advertised for availability and offered to interested parties for reuse in place or at an alternate location, or demolished if no one expresses interest. The transfer of ownership or demolition of the bridge occurs after the consultation on the level of documentation.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :The specific HAER/HABS guidelines can be found at [http://www.nps.gov/history/hdp/standards/guidelines.htm National Park Service’s Heritage Documentation Programs] (also, see [[136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements|EPG 136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements]]).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :If the SHPO recommends that the historic property be documented to the state level of documentation, the following information the information required is at EPG 136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :'''B.''' ''Archaeological Sites:'' If the adverse impacts to a National Register eligible archaeological site cannot be avoided (e.g., changes in roadway alignment, fencing, and burial under roadway fill) the usual mitigation measure is data recovery (i.e. site excavation). Excavation activities are typically limited to within the project limits. If a site is excavated, a qualified archaeologist must conduct the field investigations, analyze the remains, and prepare a Phase III data recovery report. Artifacts from excavations are the property of the LPA and must be curated at an archaeological curation facility. If human remains are encountered during the excavation, SHPO must be contacted and the state burial law ([http://www.moga.mo.gov/STATUTES/C194.HTM RSMO 194]) will need to be followed. Notification of the human remains should also be provided to FHWA and may need to be provided to consulting Indian Tribes.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If Steps 3 and 4 are required, then the date that FHWA signed the MOA is used as the Section 106 compliance date.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==135.2 The Section 106 Process for MoDOT Projects==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This article is a brief guide to [[127.2 Historic Preservation and Cultural Resources|Section 106 (cultural resources/historical preservation) compliance.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A ''cultural resource'' is any archaeological site, building, structure (e.g., bridge), object or district. Not all cultural resources are historically significant, but all have to be considered.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Why MoDOT conducts cultural resources investigations===
| |
| − | MoDOT conducts cultural resource investigations to comply with federal and state laws. Failure to obtain Section 106 clearance may jeopardize federal funding and result in stoppage of the project by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The primary legislation that requires cultural resources investigations is Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. Compliance with this law requires three things:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''1)''' ''Identify Historic Properties'' – – Determine project’s area of potential effects (APE), identify cultural resources within the APE, and evaluate historic significance of these cultural resources to determine if any are historic properties. That is, a cultural resource that is eligible for listing on the [http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/ National Register of Historic Places(NRHP)];
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''2)''' ''Assess Adverse Effects'' – Assess if the project will have an adverse effect on historic properties; and
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''3)''' ''Resolve Adverse Effects'' – Avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation of the adverse effect on historic properties.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Jobs requiring Section 106 compliance===
| |
| − | MoDOT projects that require Section 106 compliance are jobs that receive federal funds and permits and involve:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''1)''' ground disturbance within existing or proposed MoDOT right of way or easements;
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''2)''' modifications to a bridge or culvert; and/or
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''3)''' 3) destroys, relocates, or encroaches upon a building(s) or other features on a property, including sidewalks, fences, gateposts, entrance gates, and walls that may be contemporary with the building.
| |
| | | | |
| − | If a job does not meet this criteria in the design stage, but during construction or maintenance there is an activity that would meet one of these criteria the job can become a Section 106 undertaking.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ===How the district initiates cultural resources work===
| + | {|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:15px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="340px" align="center" |
| − | The cultural resources investigations are initiated through the [[127.1 Request for Environmental Services|Request for Environmental Services (RES)]]. Early involvement by MoDOT’s Historic Preservation (HP) staff provides an opportunity to identify and attempt to avoid significant cultural resources, which will minimize the time and cost of addressing Section 106 concerns during the design process.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Different levels of cultural resources investigations===
| |
| − | {|style="padding: 0.3em; margin-left:12px; border:2px solid #a9a9a9; text-align:left; font-size: 95%; background:#f5f5f5" width="400px" align="right" | |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |colspan="2" align="center"|'''<sup>1</sup>Section 4(f) Evaluation'''
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |colspan="2"|''Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966'' states that a transportation project requiring the use of publicly owned land of a public park, recreation area, wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or a publicly or privately owned <u>historic site</u> (i.e., “historic property” as defined by Section 106) may be approved only if:
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |width="10"| ||1) There is no prudent and feasible alternative to using that land; and<br/> | + | |'''This article has been deleted''' |
| − | 2) The program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the park, recreation area, wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or historic site resulting from its use.
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |colspan="2"|HP staff will develop the Section 4(f) Evaluation document, with sections created by the districts. The district design staff needs to provide design alternatives that avoid the Section 4(f) property and the cost of each alternative. It takes approximately 6 to 12 months to complete the Section 4(f) Evaluation process. | + | |The guidance of EPG 135 The Section 106 Process is adequately presented elsewhere. The MoDOT process is explained in [[127.2 Historic Preservation and Cultural Resources|EPG 127.2 Historic Preservation and Cultural Resources]]. The LPA process is explained in [[LPA:136.6 Environmental and Cultural Requirements#136.6.4.1 Section 106 (Cultural Resource) Compliance|EPG 136.6.4.1 Section 106 (Cultural Resource) Compliance]]. |
| | |} | | |} |
| − | '''1)''' ''Screening/Recon'' – Background research that identifies known cultural resources in a proposed job area, which is usually conducted during the conceptual/location project development stage. MoDOT should identify historic properties that will require a [[127.10 Section 4(f) Public Lands|Section 4(f)]] Evaluation<sup>'''1'''</sup> before the Preliminary Plans are approved. If the district has concerns about a property possibly being historically significant, they should make the Historic Preservation Section aware of the property as early as possible.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''2)''' ''Investigation for Section 106 clearance'' (should begin before preliminary plans are approved):
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :a) A Phase I survey (an intensive, systematic investigation to identify all cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed job) of the right of way and easement limits will be required. District staff will need to acquire landowner permission to allow MoDOT HP crews’ access to their portion of their property in the proposed project limits, and to photograph buildings on the property (''Note:'' After the district has obtained the initial landowner agreement, HP staff can make follow-up calls if a property owner has specific questions, requests, or concerns). A Phase II site testing will be needed if any potential NRHP eligible archaeological sites are encountered. The Phase II is a limited archaeological excavation of a site to determine its significance and whether it meets NRHP eligibility criteria. A Phase II investigation takes approximately 1-2 weeks per site.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :b) If NRHP eligible resources are identified and will be adversely affected by the proposed job, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) spelling out mitigation measures and responsibilities is required. The MOA will be prepared by the HP staff and signed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), MoDOT, and the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) at the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Indian tribes and other interested parties may participate in the development of the MOA. Tribal participation is initiated by FHWA. It will take several months to negotiate a MOA.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :If the adversely affected resource is architectural or a bridge, a Section 4(f) evaluation will need to be prepared. Information for an alternatives analysis will need to be provided by the district. A Section 4(f) Evaluation can take 6-12 months to complete for non-bridge resources.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :c) The mitigation of the adverse effects to NRHP eligible resources (e.g., a Phase III excavation for archaeological sites) may take several weeks or months to complete the fieldwork. If the adversely affected resource is an architectural resource, the building will need to be photographed (interior and exterior) after it has been acquired by MoDOT, and it must be acquired with architectural features intact. The photographs must be approved by the SHPO before the letting date; a measured floor plan may also need to be prepared for the building. Job construction can proceed following the completion of the mitigation fieldwork.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''3)''' ''Special Provisions'' – Some jobs may require special provisions to the construction contract to address cultural resources concerns. These provisions may guarantee that the stipulations agreed to in the MOA will be completed before the NRHP eligible resource(s) is/are adversely affected by construction, or to protect cultural resources from collateral damage that may occur during construction (e.g., monitoring construction or avoidance of certain areas within the job boundaries). The HP staff will draft the special provisions.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===How the district initiates cultural resources work===
| |
| − | The cultural resources investigations can be initiated through a Request for Environmental Services (RES) submitted to the HP Section of the Central Office. Early involvement by MoDOT’s HP staff provides an opportunity to identify and attempt to avoid significant cultural resources, which will minimize the time and cost of addressing Section 106 concerns during the design process.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Timelines===
| |
| − | Most of the cultural resources' work should be conducted during the preliminary design stage of plan development. Upon the completion of the cultural resources investigations, a report is submitted to the SHPO summarizing MoDOT’s effort to identify historic properties and determine the effects the proposed job would have on these properties. SHPO has 30 days to comment on these findings. Below are several important cultural resources' milestones from the Right of Way and Construction Program database:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :* During the "Conceptual/Location Study," the HP staff should be consulted to determine whether the project is a Section 106 undertaking, and if so, initiated the Section 106 process;
| |
| − | :* During the Preliminary Plans stage and after the district has obtained land owner permission for the HP fieldwork, HP staff should identify any historic properties, assess the project’s affects upon them, resolve any adverse effects, and obtained SHPO’s concurrence with MoDOT’s finding (i.e., the standard Section 106 process). HP staff should also identify any historic Section 4(f) properties.
| |
| − | :* By the Right of Way Plans stage, HP staff should have completed the standard Section 106 process (the preferred method) or notified FHWA and SHPO that a “Phased” Section 106 process is being used. <br/>The "Phased" Section 106 process is used when access to enough property is restricted to prevent a standard investigation to complete the Section 106 process before the ROW stage of project development. This allows the release of federal funds for the purchase of properties with MoDOT making a commitment to complete the Section 106 process, which might lead to selling previously acquired property and the purchase of additional property in able to avoid an adverse effect to a historic property determined later in the project development process. An A-date for property acquisition can be set upon SHPO accepting the initial Phased Section 106 submittal or by SHPO not responding within 15 days of their having received the submittal.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :* By the completion of the Final Design stage, the “Phased” Section 106 process should be completed if being used.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | By meeting these milestones, the HP staff should have opportunities to identify and attempt to avoid significant cultural resources, not delay purchase of right of way, and complete the Section 106 process well before the job's plan completion date.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[image:135.2 flowchart.jpg|center|730px|thumb|<center>'''Section 106 Flowchart'''</center>
| |
| − | {| align="center"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Detailed information regarding this flowchart can be found at the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's website [http://www.achp.gov/regsflow.html Section 106 Regulations Flow Chart].
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |MoDOT’s responsibilities under Section 106 are explained at [http://epg.modot.mo.gov/index.php?title=Historic_Preservation#Historic_Preservation EPG Historic Preservation].
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | ]]
| |
| − | [[image:135 historic bridge.jpg|center|750px]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==135.3 Borrow and Excess Material Areas==
| |
| − | Most borrow and excess material areas are “contractor furnished” with the contractor responsible for attainment or disposal of the necessary materials and compliance with all environmental responsibilities. Typically, the contractor will submit the [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/780-1027-f.pdf Section 106 Project Information Form] to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The SHPO has a maximum of 30 days to review this information. The formal SHPO response consists of a letter indicating that no cultural resource survey is required for the identified area or that a cultural resource survey is required. If a survey is required, the contractor may engage a cultural resource firm to conduct the work. Further guidance for hiring a qualified cultural resource consultant may be found at: [http://www.dnr.mo.gov/shpo/consultants.htm http://www.dnr.mo.gov/shpo/consultants.htm]. Lists of firms qualified by the SHPO can be found on that web site. If asked by a contractor to provide the names of cultural resource contractors, it is important to refer them to the SHPO list and not provide the name of specific firms. For additional information, contractors needing cultural resource help can contact the MoDOT Historic Preservation Section.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In certain cases, MoDOT staff will designate preferred borrow or excess material areas. In these cases, MoDOT usually has obtained Section 106 concurrence for use of the area. For MoDOT to obtain Section 106 clearance for a borrow or excess material area, the project manager should submit an RES with the proposed areas indicated on a topographic map to [http://wwwi/design/default.htm Design]. The time line for MoDOT to obtain Section 106 should allow enough time for MoDOT to conduct the field investigations (if needed) and the SHPO to review and comment on the recommendations (by law the SHPO has 30 days to comment).
| |
